

Uncovering Hidden Fees in Property Management: What Owners Need to Know to Protect Their Profits
Dec 25, 2025
5 min read
5
3
0
Property management companies often present themselves as partners who simplify the complex task of managing real estate assets. Yet, beneath the surface of standard contracts and fee schedules, many owners and asset managers encounter property management hidden fees that chip away at their returns. These fees can take many forms, from passing corporate employee costs to owners, to preferred vendor partnerships that inflate expenses, and excessive training or corporate fees that seem unrelated to property operations.
Understanding these hidden charges, recognizing when they are justified, and knowing how to respond can protect owners’ profits and improve transparency in property management relationships.

Corporate Employee Costs Passed to Owners
One common hidden fee involves property management companies charging owners for corporate employee expenses. These costs might include salaries, benefits, or overhead for staff who do not directly manage the property but work at the corporate level.
How This Fee Appears
A line item labeled “corporate overhead” or “administrative fee” added to monthly invoices.
Charges for staff training, HR, or accounting functions bundled into property expenses.
Fees that increase annually without clear justification.
Why It Matters
Owners expect property management fees to cover services directly related to managing their asset. Passing corporate employee costs to owners can inflate expenses without adding value to the property’s operation.
What Owners Should Ask
Which corporate employees’ costs are included in the fee?
How do these costs benefit the specific property?
Can these expenses be capped or excluded?
When It Might Be Worth Paying
If the corporate team provides specialized services that improve property performance, such as legal compliance or strategic asset management, a reasonable fee may be justified. However, these should be transparent and clearly linked to measurable benefits.
Preferred Vendor Partnerships That Cost More
Property management companies often have preferred vendors for maintenance, repairs, and services. While these partnerships can streamline operations, they sometimes lead to higher costs for owners.
How This Fee Appears
Markups on vendor invoices.
Limited vendor options forcing owners to accept higher prices.
Charges for vendor management or coordination.
Why It Matters
Preferred vendors may charge above-market rates, and owners end up paying the difference. Lack of competitive bidding reduces cost control and transparency.
What Owners Should Ask
Are vendor prices competitive compared to market rates?
Can owners approve vendors or request bids from alternatives?
Is there a markup on vendor invoices, and if so, how much?
When It Might Be Worth Paying
If preferred vendors provide superior quality, faster service, or warranties that reduce long-term costs, paying a slight premium could be beneficial. Owners should weigh these benefits against the price difference.
Excessive Training and Corporate Fees
Training and corporate fees can be another source of hidden costs. Property management companies may charge owners for ongoing staff training, certifications, or corporate initiatives.
How This Fee Appears
Fees labeled “training,” “corporate development,” or “staff certification.”
Charges that appear regularly without clear explanation.
Fees that do not correlate with improved property management outcomes.
Why It Matters
While staff training is important, owners should not bear the full cost of corporate initiatives that do not directly improve property performance.
What Owners Should Ask
What specific training or corporate programs are funded by these fees?
How do these programs improve service or reduce risks at the property?
Can these fees be bundled into the standard management fee?
When It Might Be Worth Paying
If training leads to compliance with new regulations or improves tenant retention, fees may be justified. Owners should request evidence of benefits tied to these costs.
Examples of Common Hidden Fees and How to Respond
Marketing Fees for Strategic Packages
Some property managers charge extra for marketing packages that should be part of the standard marketing service. For example, an additional “strategic marketing fee” should not be charged when you are already committed to online listings, professional photography, or advertising campaigns as part of your contract.
Owner Response:
Request a breakdown of marketing services included in the base fee. If marketing is essential to leasing success, it should be part of the standard package. Negotiate to include these services or reduce the fee.
Asset Management Fees
Charging an asset management fee on top of property management fees can be a red flag if the services overlap. Asset management involves higher-level financial oversight, but some companies use this fee to increase revenue without clear added value.
Owner Response:
Clarify the scope of asset management services. If the property manager is also acting as an asset manager, ensure fees are justified by distinct services such as budgeting, financial reporting, or capital planning.
Compliance Monitoring Fees
Fees for compliance monitoring, such as safety inspections, collecting affordable rents, or regulatory reporting, may appear separately. While compliance is critical, these tasks often fall under standard management duties.
Owner Response:
Ask if compliance monitoring is included in the management fee. If charged separately, request documentation of the work performed and its impact on risk reduction.
Property Management Fees
Sometimes, the base property management fee itself is not transparent. It may exclude essential services or be structured to allow additional fees for routine tasks.
Owner Response:
Review the management agreement carefully. Ensure the fee covers core services like rent collection, maintenance coordination, tenant communication, and financial reporting. Question any additional fees for routine duties.

How to Differentiate Fees Worth Paying from Hidden Costs
Owners and asset managers can use industry standards and practical criteria to evaluate fees:
Transparency: Fees should be clearly explained and documented.
Value: Fees must correspond to services that improve property performance or reduce risks.
Market Comparison: Fees should align with what other property managers charge for similar services.
Negotiability: Owners should have the ability to negotiate or opt out of certain fees.
Bundling: Essential services should be included in the base fee, not charged separately.
Practical Steps for Owners
Request detailed fee schedules and explanations before signing contracts.
Compare proposals from multiple property management companies.
Ask for examples or case studies showing how fees translate into benefits.
Insist on regular reporting that links fees to outcomes.
Consider hiring an independent consultant to review contracts and fees.
Property management hidden fees can significantly reduce the profitability of real estate investments. By understanding common fee structures, asking the right questions, and demanding transparency, owners and asset managers can protect their returns and build stronger partnerships with property managers. The key lies in distinguishing fees that add real value from those that simply increase costs without benefit.
Thanks!
DC & Mox
The information provided on this website is intended for general informational purposes only and should not be considered as personalized advice. It is recommended that you seek professional guidance tailored to your specific requirements. The views expressed are solely those of the authors, and Moxie Consults does not accept responsibility for third-party opinions. Please refrain from sharing confidential information until a service agreement has been established. The content on this site is not guaranteed to be accurate or comprehensive and should not be interpreted as financial, legal, or any other form of professional advice. Links to external websites are included for convenience and do not imply endorsement or accountability by Moxie Consults for their content. The use of this website does not guarantee specific outcomes. All materials on the site are either owned by or licensed to Moxie Consults and are protected by copyright laws. Moxie Consults reserves the right to modify information without prior notification. Users are responsible for keeping themselves updated. By using the website, users agree to release Moxie Consults from any liability. This disclaimer is governed by the laws of Colorado.





