Are they simply the best? Are they better than all the rest?
There is a person in the multifamily sector, affectionately nicknamed as B-Dawg in this instance, whom I deeply admire for their strong advocacy of internal promotions. I find this aspect of their leadership praiseworthy because I also believe in the importance of nurturing existing team members and offering them growth opportunities.
When faced with the decision of hiring external top talent versus developing internal candidates for key roles within your company, it is important to carefully weigh the advantages and disadvantages of each approach. The dedication to fostering and advancing talent from within is truly motivating. This strategy not only showcases their trust in the potential of current team members but also reveals a strategic grasp of the benefits that internal growth and development can bring to an organization.
By fostering a culture that prioritizes internal progression, leaders like B-Dawg not only empower their current workforce but also cultivate a team of skilled and motivated individuals dedicated to the company's success. This strategic talent management approach can lead to lasting benefits for the company, such as increased employee engagement, reduced recruitment expenses, and a more cohesive work environment.
Choosing between hiring external candidates with established expertise and nurturing internal employees for key roles requires careful deliberation. While external recruits can offer fresh perspectives and specialized knowledge, internal promotions can boost morale, dedication, and team cohesion. Furthermore, internal promotions demonstrate a dedication to employee development, which can have a positive impact on retention rates and organizational ethos.
However, what if there isn't a suitable candidate available for your current business needs? In cases of immediate requirements that cannot be met internally, such as introducing a new position, is it more practical to recruit externally or invest in training an internal candidate?
What strategy should you adopt? To spark some ideas, we have compiled a list of the advantages and disadvantages of both hiring external candidates and promoting internal employees.
Recruiting Top-Tier Talent
Advantages:
Expertise: Attracting individuals with a demonstrated history of success and specific expertise that may be lacking internally. These professionals typically bring a wealth of knowledge and experience in their particular areas, enabling them to provide distinct viewpoints and creative solutions to intricate challenges. By utilizing their skills, organizations can secure a competitive advantage, stimulate expansion, and improve their overall effectiveness.
Fresh Perspective: Offering novel ideas, innovation, and insights can propel the company's progress. By bringing in new viewpoints, individuals have the opportunity to question current standards and beliefs, fostering a culture of creativity and ongoing enhancement. These innovative concepts can result in significant advancements, enabling the company to outperform competitors and adjust to evolving market trends.
Immediate Impact: Experienced professionals typically need minimal onboarding and are able to immediately add value to projects. Their extensive knowledge of industry standards and successful history allow them to have an instant influence on projects. By utilizing their previous experiences, they can provide distinctive viewpoints and ideas that promote innovation and productivity within the company.
Competitive Edge: Possessing talent that is acknowledged by the industry can enhance your market position and brand visibility. To begin with, professionals recognized in the industry bring a sense of credibility and expertise to the company, fostering trust among customers, partners, and stakeholders. Consequently, this can result in heightened brand visibility and a favorable reputation within the sector. Additionally, having industry-recognized talent can offer a competitive edge in attracting top-tier professionals.
Disadvantages:
Cost: Recruiting top talents typically involves meeting high salary expectations and potentially offering additional benefits. Companies encounter the dilemma of satisfying high salary demands and presenting extra perks in order to entice the finest candidates in a competitive job market when seeking to hire top talents. Providing competitive compensation packages is crucial not only for securing the services of top talents but also for retaining them over time. Along with a generous salary, companies might need to contemplate providing benefits like health insurance, retirement plans, flexible work schedules, opportunities for professional growth, and other rewards to enhance the attractiveness of the job offer.
Q: Which innovative compensation tactics could your company implement to stand out in a crowded field of otherwise comparable compensation plans?
Cultural Fit: When evaluating external candidates, there is a potential risk that their qualifications may not align harmoniously with the company culture. Despite their impressive credentials, there is a possibility that they may face challenges in adapting smoothly to the established company culture. This incongruity could result in team disunity, communication issues, and ultimately affect productivity and morale.
Q: What kind of training does your company provide for new employees to ensure a cultural fit during onboarding? Do you assign them a buddy or implement other innovative methods to familiarize them with your company culture and introduce them to colleagues, or do you leave them to fend for themselves?
Retention: Competitors frequently seek out highly skilled professionals, causing retention challenges. The ongoing high demand for top talent in the market results in skilled employees being regularly approached by competitors, increasing the risk of losing valuable staff members. This not only disrupts the organization's workflow and stability but also jeopardizes its long-term success.
Q: Do you regularly engage in quarterly check-ins with your employees to verify their satisfaction within your organization? Are you proactive in collecting feedback from all levels of your company to ensure that both supervisors and employees receive authentic performance evaluations, or does your company rely solely on a top-down approach? Is this practice also communicated to potential external candidates?
Internal Morale: If external candidates are consistently favored for top positions, current employees might start feeling neglected or unappreciated. This situation could result in disillusionment among the workforce, affecting their dedication and morale towards the company.
Q: Is your company currently providing training programs and succession planning for your current team members before considering external recruitment?
Training Up Internal Candidates
Advantages:
Cost-Effective: Internal promotions or transfers are often a cost-effective choice in contrast to external recruitment as they remove hiring expenses and may lead to less significant salary changes (not that I agree with this part - be competitive, even with your internal candidates. Worth is worth!). By advancing or moving existing staff members, the organization can cut down on recruitment costs and utilize the employee's familiarity with the company's culture, processes, and norms, thereby easing a smooth transition and accelerating productivity enhancements. Furthermore, internal promotions can boost employee morale and motivation by recognizing the skills and potential of the current workforce, fostering loyalty and commitment.
Cultural Alignment: Employees who are already part of the company have a unique edge in understanding and embodying the company's culture. Their firsthand exposure to the organization's values, norms, and procedures molds their identity and helps them incorporate this knowledge into their daily responsibilities, guaranteeing harmony with the company's goals and aspirations. Additionally, internal candidates have built relationships within the company that are essential for teamwork, seeking assistance, and maneuvering through workplace intricacies.
Employee Engagement: Investing in employee development can increase morale, foster loyalty, and ultimately lead to reduced turnover rates. When employees perceive opportunities for growth within the company and believe that their skills are appreciated and encouraged, they are more inclined to remain with the organization. This retention can lead to cost savings for the company, as recruiting and training new employees can be expensive.
Talent Development: Fostering a learning culture through talent development can identify potential future leaders within a company. By dedicating resources to develop talent, organizations can cultivate a team of competent and skilled employees ready to assume higher roles and propel the company's growth. Moreover, prioritizing talent development can enhance employee engagement, retention rates, and overall performance, resulting in a more efficient and prosperous workforce.
Disadvantages:
Time: Employees who have received proper training are more capable of facing challenges, adjusting to changes, and making valuable contributions to the organization's progress and advancement. However, the process of training and developing employees is time-consuming. The time spent on employee development could potentially cause delays in addressing urgent business requirements.
Q: What measures is your company implementing to equip employees for future positions, thereby reducing potential downtime should advancement opportunities present themselves?
Skill Gaps: The current workforce may not possess the potential or desire to learn the skills required for certain roles. In today's rapidly evolving job market, it is essential for organizations to recognize the challenges their employees may face in acquiring the necessary skills for specific positions. Technological advancements, changing job requirements, and fluctuating industry trends can contribute to this skills gap. For businesses to succeed, they must proactively address this issue by implementing targeted training, upskilling initiatives, and mentorship programs to bridge the skills gap within their workforce.
Q: What evaluation strategies are implemented to ensure employees fulfill the requirements of technological, industry-specific, and skill-related demands?
Risk of Failure: If an internal candidate is not ready or lacks the ability to advance, it can have a negative impact on both project outcomes and team dynamics. The candidate's lack of readiness or skills could cause project delays, reduced productivity, and widespread uncertainty within the team. This scenario could erode team morale as members may become frustrated by stalled progress or the lack of clear direction. If the internal candidate fails to meet the requirements of the new role, it could place an additional burden on other team members who may have to compensate for these deficiencies, potentially leading to burnout among team members already managing their own workload and responsibilities.
Q: What is your strategy for assessing whether an internal candidate is prepared to progress in their current role or if they are lacking the necessary skills?
Limited Perspectives: An organization without new talent may lag in adopting innovative ideas and practices prevalent in the market. New perspectives bring a diverse range of experiences, skills, and knowledge that can spark creativity and foster a culture of continuous improvement. Keeping up with the latest trends and practices ensures the organization remains relevant and adaptable amidst changing market dynamics. Additionally, new members contribute to a dynamic and lively environment that promotes collaboration, the exchange of ideas, and the creation of novel solutions to complex problems.
Q: Do you think your organization has a fair distribution of experienced internal staff and new recruits to effectively meet the requirements for staying competitive in your industry?
The choice between recruiting external talent or developing internal candidates must align with the company's strategic goals, budget constraints, immediate needs, and long-term HR strategy. Often, a hybrid approach is most beneficial, combining the strengths of both strategies to build a dynamic and robust workforce.
Irrespective of the strategy selected, it is strongly recommended, and in certain areas legally mandated (please verify local regulations), to inform all internal staff about potential career progression prospects. Additionally, it is advised to extend interview opportunities to current team members, even if they appear unready, as this allows for feedback and potential development. Once more, ensure compliance with local regulations!
Based on our experience, employees who are aware of opportunities for advancement tend to be more engaged, creative, and make a positive impact on the work environment.
We will address interview processes in an upcoming blog post, so stay tuned for our insights on panel interviews, third, fourth, and fifth-round interviews, and evaluating whether your team member is a good interviewer.
Happy Recruiting!
DC & Mox
The information provided on this website is intended for general informational purposes only and should not be considered as personalized advice. It is recommended that you seek professional guidance tailored to your specific requirements. The views expressed are solely those of the authors, and Moxie Consults, LLC does not accept responsibility for third-party opinions. Please refrain from sharing confidential information until a service agreement has been established. The content on this site is not guaranteed to be accurate or comprehensive and should not be interpreted as financial, legal, or any other form of professional advice. Links to external websites are included for convenience and do not imply endorsement or accountability by Moxie Consults, LLC for their content. The use of this website does not guarantee specific outcomes. All materials on the site are either owned by or licensed to Moxie Consults, LLC and are protected by copyright laws. Moxie Consults, LLC reserves the right to modify information without prior notification. Users are responsible for keeping themselves updated. By using the website, users agree to release Moxie Consults, LLC from any liability. This disclaimer is governed by the laws of Colorado.
